Strengthening Legal Frameworks for Vaccination: The Experiences of Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova

Background
Vaccination legislation may promote country ownership and immunization program sustainability. However, despite establishment of vaccination laws as an indicator of national commitment to immunization through the Global Vaccine Action Plan, little is known about the content of vaccination legislation in low- and middle-income countries and the processes by which countries strengthen their legal frameworks. We describe the experiences of three countries supported by Gavi through its partnership with the Sabin Vaccine Institute— Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova—in strengthening their legal frameworks for vaccination as they transition from Gavi support.

Methods
Information presented comes from national legal documents and the 2017 European Regional Workshop on Immunization Legislation, in which legislators and health officials from Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova shared approaches to making immunization a national priority by strengthening legal frameworks. We outline each country’s legislative framework, describe progress in modifying vaccination legislation, and present strategies developed by countries to continue strengthening the legal basis of their immunization programs.

Results
Armenia, Georgia, and Moldova have legal frameworks that guarantee immunization as a public good, define immunization calendars, and establish regulations for vaccine procurement and administration. Legislative priorities include modifications of regulations to optimize procurement (Armenia and Moldova), potential provisions to increase vaccination through incentives (Georgia) or requirements (Moldova, possibly Armenia), and new mechanisms to finance routine program costs (all three countries). Each country is employing a distinct approach to strengthen its legal framework.

Conclusions

These country experiences suggest that while legal approaches can promote country ownership, there is no standardized approach to vaccination legislation. A better understanding of the complex legal frameworks and their impact on supporting and sustaining progress in vaccination is needed.

You May Also Like

Scoping Review of Current Costing Literature on Interventions to Reach Zero-Dose Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

A study in Vaccines analyzes the costs and effectiveness of interventions aimed at reaching zero-dose children—those who have not received any routine vaccinations—in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The research evaluates strategies such as mobile outreach, community engagement, and health system strengthening, highlighting their cost-effectiveness in improving immunisation coverage. The findings suggest that tailored, context-specific … Read More

Private sector engagement for immunisation programs: a pragmatic scoping review of 25 years of evidence on good practice in low-income and middle-income countries

A study in BMJ Global Health explores the role of private sector engagement in strengthening immunisation programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The research highlights that partnerships with private healthcare providers, pharmacies, and businesses can expand vaccine access, improve service delivery, and increase coverage. Key strategies include leveraging private sector infrastructure, integrating public-private data … Read More

Socioeconomic-related inequities in child immunisation: horizontal and vertical dimensions for policy insights

A study in Health Economics Review investigates the economic and equity impacts of expanding immunisation programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), focusing on the cost-effectiveness of introducing new vaccines. The research highlights that while scaling up immunisation efforts requires significant investment, the long-term benefits—such as reduced disease burden, healthcare savings, and improved productivity—justify the … Read More