Immunization, Urbanization and Slums – A Systematic Review of Factors and Interventions

Background

In 2014, over half (54%) of the world’s population lived in urban areas and this proportion will increase to 66% by 2050. This urbanizing trend has been accompanied by an increasing number of people living in urban poor communities and slums. Lower immunization coverage is found in poorer urban dwellers in many contexts. This study aims to identify factors associated with immunization coverage in poor urban areas and slums, and to identify interventions to improve coverage.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, searching Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science and The Cochrane Database with broad search terms for studies published between 2000 and 2016.

Results

Of 4872 unique articles, 327 abstracts were screened, leading to 63 included studies: 44 considering factors and 20 evaluating interventions (one in both categories) in 16 low or middle-income countries. A wide range of socio-economic characteristics were associated with coverage in different contexts. Recent rural-urban migration had a universally negative effect. Parents commonly reported lack of awareness of immunization importance and difficulty accessing services as reasons for under-immunization of their children. Physical distance to clinics and aspects of service quality also impacted uptake. We found evidence of effectiveness for interventions involving multiple components, especially if they have been designed with community involvement. Outreach programmes were effective where physical distance was identified as a barrier. Some evidence was found for the effective use of SMS (text) messaging services, community-based education programmes and financial incentives, which warrant further evaluation. No interventions were identified that provided services to migrants from rural areas.

Conclusion

Different factors affect immunization coverage in different urban poor and slum contexts. Immunization services should be designed in collaboration with slum-dwelling communities, considering the local context. Interventions should be designed and tested to increase immunization in migrants from rural areas.

You May Also Like

Scoping Review of Current Costing Literature on Interventions to Reach Zero-Dose Children in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

A study in Vaccines analyzes the costs and effectiveness of interventions aimed at reaching zero-dose children—those who have not received any routine vaccinations—in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The research evaluates strategies such as mobile outreach, community engagement, and health system strengthening, highlighting their cost-effectiveness in improving immunisation coverage. The findings suggest that tailored, context-specific … Read More

Private sector engagement for immunisation programs: a pragmatic scoping review of 25 years of evidence on good practice in low-income and middle-income countries

A study in BMJ Global Health explores the role of private sector engagement in strengthening immunisation programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The research highlights that partnerships with private healthcare providers, pharmacies, and businesses can expand vaccine access, improve service delivery, and increase coverage. Key strategies include leveraging private sector infrastructure, integrating public-private data … Read More

Socioeconomic-related inequities in child immunisation: horizontal and vertical dimensions for policy insights

A study in Health Economics Review investigates the economic and equity impacts of expanding immunisation programs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), focusing on the cost-effectiveness of introducing new vaccines. The research highlights that while scaling up immunisation efforts requires significant investment, the long-term benefits—such as reduced disease burden, healthcare savings, and improved productivity—justify the … Read More