How Organisations Promoting Vaccination Respond to Misinformation on Social Media: A Qualitative Investigation

Background

Vaccination misinformation is associated with serious public health consequences, such as a decrease in vaccination rates and a risk of disease outbreaks. Although social media offers organisations promoting vaccination unparalleled opportunities to promote evidence and counterbalance misinformation, we know relatively little about their internal workings. The aim of this paper is to explore the strategies, perspectives and experiences of communicators working within such organisations as they promote vaccination and respond to misinformation on social media.

Methods

Using qualitative methods, we purposively sampled 21 participants responsible for routine social media activity and strategy from Australian organisations actively promoting vaccination on social media, including government health departments, local health services, advocacy groups, professional associations and technical/scientific organisations. We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews to explore their perspectives and practices. Applying Risk Communication principles as a lens, we used Framework Analysis to explore the data both inductively and deductively.

Results

Organisations promoting vaccination face multiple challenges on social media, including misinformation, anti-science sentiment, a complex vaccination narrative and anti-vaccine activists. They developed a range of sophisticated strategies in response, including communicating with openness in an evidence-informed way; creating safe spaces to encourage audience dialogue; fostering community partnerships; and countering misinformation with care.

Conclusions

We recommend that communicators consider directly countering misinformation because of the potential influence on their silent audience, i.e. those observing but not openly commenting, liking or sharing posts. Refutations should be straightforward, succinct and avoid emphasizing misinformation. Communicators should consider pairing scientific evidence with stories that speak to audience beliefs and values. Finally, organisations could enhance vaccine promotion and their own credibility on social media by forming strong links with organisations sharing similar values and goals.

 

You May Also Like

Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries

A study in Nature Human Behaviour explores the role of behavioral science in addressing vaccine hesitancy and improving immunization rates. The research identifies key psychological and social factors influencing vaccine decisions, such as trust in institutions, risk perception, and social norms. It highlights the effectiveness of interventions like tailored messaging, nudges, and leveraging social influencers … Read More

Linked Practitioner Perspective: HPV vaccine demand generation and acceptance strategies: Experiences from Philippines

During our workshop focused on HPV demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies, we sat down with Hugo Catan, Health Program Officer, Department of Health, Health Promotion Bureau, Philippines to discuss the country’s experience introducing the HPV vaccine using a school-based immunisation strategy. Discover the Philippine’s experiences and insights in our practitioner perspective video, available in … Read More

Linked Practitioner Perspective: HPV vaccine demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies – experiences from Kosovo

During our workshop focused on HPV demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies, we sat down with Dafina Gexha-Bunjaku, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Health, Kosovo, to discuss the country’s experience introducing the HPV vaccine, generating formative evidence on perceptions of the vaccine, developing a communication intervention plan, and overcoming barriers to vaccine uptake. Discover Kosovo’s experiences … Read More