Factors Influencing the Prioritization of Vaccines by Policymakers in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Scoping Review

LOOK AT THIS IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN:

Understanding the factors  involved in governments’ decision-making processes when deciding whether to integrate new vaccines into their national immunisation programmes.

HOW YOU CAN USE THIS MATERIAL:

Governments deciding whether to integrate new vaccines into their national immunisation programmes can use these findings to understand new vaccine introduction decision-making processes and factors, including actors, programmatic considerations, vaccine price, communication and advocacy, and more.

OVERVIEW:

Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMICs) have to make difficult choices on which vaccines to prioritize for introduction while considering a wide range of factors such as disease burden, vaccine impact, vaccine characteristics, financing and health care infrastructures, whilst adapting to each country’s specific contexts. This scoping review examined the factors that influence decision-making among policymakers for the introduction of new vaccines in LMICs. The review identified the specific data points that are factored into the decision-making process for new vaccine introduction, whilst also documenting whether there have been any changes in decision-making criteria in new vaccine introduction over the last two decades.

Key Messages:

  • The decision-making environment for new vaccine introduction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is complex in the face of competing health priorities. Numerous criteria must be considered in the decision-making process which can pose as facilitators or barriers to new vaccine introduction.
  • The importance of the disease, including disease burden, costs of disease and political prioritization, coupled with economic factors such as vaccine price, affordability and financing, were the most common criteria considered for new vaccine introduction.
  • Communication efforts and sociocultural considerations pertaining to vaccines may have a more relevant role in the decision-making process in LMICs.
  • The combination of numerous criteria results in a decision-point leading to a window of opportunity for policy makers to decide whether to move forward with vaccine implementation.

You May Also Like

Linked Country Case Study: Strengthening Tunisia’s HPV Vaccine Introduction

The Linked Immunisation Action Network played a pivotal role in supporting Tunisia’s HPV vaccine introduction by leveraging peer-to-peer learning and cross-regional collaboration. Tunisia joined the network in 2023 during critical preparations for its school-based HPV rollout targeting 12-year-old girls. Participation in global workshops, including an Istanbul session with peers like the Philippines and Mongolia, provided … Read More

Download
File size: 2.56M

Health and economic implications of adopting a 1-dose 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccination program in adolescents in LMICs: An analysis of Indonesia

A study in PLOS ONE evaluates the feasibility and impact of a single-dose 9-valent HPV vaccination program in Indonesia, focusing on its potential to reduce cervical cancer rates. The research highlights that a single-dose regimen is cost-effective, logistically simpler, and more accessible, particularly in low-resource settings. It also emphasizes the importance of community engagement and … Read More

HPV introduction and implementation: Case studies from Africa and South Asia

This special issue of Vaccine focuses on innovations and challenges in strengthening immunization programs globally. Key themes include the integration of new vaccine technologies, such as mRNA vaccines, into existing systems, and strategies to address inequities in vaccine access. Several articles highlight the importance of data-driven decision-making, supply chain resilience, and workforce training to improve … Read More