Factors Influencing the Prioritization of Vaccines by Policymakers in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Scoping Review

LOOK AT THIS IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN:

Understanding the factors  involved in governments’ decision-making processes when deciding whether to integrate new vaccines into their national immunisation programmes.

HOW YOU CAN USE THIS MATERIAL:

Governments deciding whether to integrate new vaccines into their national immunisation programmes can use these findings to understand new vaccine introduction decision-making processes and factors, including actors, programmatic considerations, vaccine price, communication and advocacy, and more.

OVERVIEW:

Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMICs) have to make difficult choices on which vaccines to prioritize for introduction while considering a wide range of factors such as disease burden, vaccine impact, vaccine characteristics, financing and health care infrastructures, whilst adapting to each country’s specific contexts. This scoping review examined the factors that influence decision-making among policymakers for the introduction of new vaccines in LMICs. The review identified the specific data points that are factored into the decision-making process for new vaccine introduction, whilst also documenting whether there have been any changes in decision-making criteria in new vaccine introduction over the last two decades.

Key Messages:

  • The decision-making environment for new vaccine introduction in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is complex in the face of competing health priorities. Numerous criteria must be considered in the decision-making process which can pose as facilitators or barriers to new vaccine introduction.
  • The importance of the disease, including disease burden, costs of disease and political prioritization, coupled with economic factors such as vaccine price, affordability and financing, were the most common criteria considered for new vaccine introduction.
  • Communication efforts and sociocultural considerations pertaining to vaccines may have a more relevant role in the decision-making process in LMICs.
  • The combination of numerous criteria results in a decision-point leading to a window of opportunity for policy makers to decide whether to move forward with vaccine implementation.

You May Also Like

Linked Brief: New vaccine introduction in middle income countries: HPV demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies – Key takeaways from Linked’s workshop held on October 22-23rd, 2024

The Linked Immunisation Action Network welcomed immunisation practitioners from six middle-income countries (MICs) along with global and regional technical experts, for a workshop focused on “New Vaccines Introduction in Middle Income Countries: HPV demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies”. Held in Istanbul, Turkey, on 22-23 October 2024, the objective of this workshop was to facilitate … Read More

Download
File size: 319.55K

Linked Workshop: New vaccine introduction in Middle Income Countries: HPV Demand generation and vaccine acceptance strategies

Linked convened country representatives and partners from Cuba, Kosovo, Mongolia, Philippines, Tunisia, and Viet Nam, to discuss challenges to build trust, acceptance, and uptake of the HPV vaccine, as well as tools and strategies to support countries to overcome these challenges. Explore country experiences in the workshop materials below. Country Posters Cuba Kosovo Mongolia Philippines … Read More

Linked Webinar: One-dose HPV vaccination: Evidence, lessons learned and implementation strategies, with experiences from Guyana and Estonia

Choosing or switching to a single dose HPV vaccination can simplify delivery and lower program costs. It can also help reduce the potential for supply shortages and loss to follow-up. Linked held a virtual learning session to aid countries who are in the initial stages of introducing the HPV vaccine or considering a switch, strengthening … Read More